Effectiveness is the fundamental real name does not matter
For the mobile phone real name system, you can say that this outcome, as early as controversy broke out already doomed. The reason is that the state originally for mobile phone real name system management, and only then because of “market development” and be relaxed, and now as a “new needs” to give it up tight, like there is no need to discuss what further . Strangely enough, however, this did not need to discuss the issue, has become a hotly controversial topic, difficult to say this is a misunderstanding or an improvement.
The largest mobile phone real name system the focus of controversy is the so-called “personal privacy” concerns about whether it would have been violated. On this issue, I understand it is fuss. In fact, we all know we all know, the leak has already leaked, could have been violations of violations, and will not be a mobile phone and add more risk. In contrast, mobile phone real name system be implemented, would have occurred repeatedly in recent mobile phone fraud to some extent the effectiveness of containment for the safety of mobile phone users to provide more protection. In this sense, the implementation of mobile phone real name system is a good thing, not bad, at least one is not worth a fuss about.
Why say surprising, because this policy can be well implemented ultimately no guarantee, then they should be our utmost concern. As noted above, mobile phone real name system for mobile phone users on the proper little effect and is beneficial to protect its security, for the illegal people who are experiencing tremendous obstacles, they must strive to be opposed. Also from the mobile operators and handset vendors point of view, real-name system will almost certainly affect the market, resulting in decreased revenues and profits, so they actually do not welcome the real-name system. After the existence of these two forces, the implementation of the real name system constitutes a strong resistance to the implementation and effectiveness of real-name system to add a lot of variables. Here we may wish to exercise of imagination, speculation about several situations that may arise.
The first case we assume that this policy be full and complete implementation, operators, vendors to act in strict accordance with, all depend on the implementation of the wrongful act of mobile phone sales has disappeared from the user completely out of fraudulent messages, spam messages, yellow scripts and other threats and harassment. As a law-abiding mobile phone users, obviously this is the best we are happy to see a result.
The second case, the policy can not be implemented as well as a total failure, there is no convergence of wrongdoing and day upon day, user security is greatly threatened. This situation led to the premise that operators, vendors, the implementation of passive resistance to the real name system, so the policy that eventually became a dead letter.
The third case, the real name system be partially implemented. Strictly enforced in some places, some places are more loose or very loose. Alternatively, real-name registration system is well implemented throughout the country, criminals turned to using false documents, and number, burglary and other means to evade the law No. supervision and punishment. Thus, although the increased level of cell phone safety, it is impossible to completely curb all kinds of illegal activities.
Obviously, these three cases, the first two there are very less, most likely to become a reality is a third. In this regard, various media have been from the mobile phone market sales channels, regional differences, policy implementation and other aspects of the objective difficulties to do a more detailed analysis, from which we can easily draw the conclusion that the terms with the reality of the domestic market, mobile phone not only difficult to implement real-name system, and almost impossible to get good results.
This concern can be said, makes sense. We know the real name system is the key ID and ID management, validation and use of precisely that there are many loopholes in it. For example a person's identity card lost (this is a very common thing), to register at the police station can re-submit a new, and lost the same, have the same legal effect, equivalent to a cloned, and it not in the hands should hold its hands. There are also some people to lend for economic purposes or to replace use of ID cards, do not think this may have financial responsibility and legal liability. Can imagine that such a person even if the final was held, for the fight against crime is too late. If you talk to clone ID act together, can not even distinguish whether the law enforcement agencies who are the real culprits.
In general, mobile phone real name system is facing a fundamental problem is how to make it as far as possible be implemented to achieve the best possible results. I personally think that mobile operators and their agents will not resist the implementation of real-name system, but is unlikely to strictly comply with the implementation - is also strictly not to strict. This determines the real names of the future and destiny: the successful introduction, implementation difficulties, the effectiveness is limited, better than nothing.
Recommended links:
Describes the properties of the problem MIDP
Review Games And Entertainment
Programming For The Constrained Environment
Ninetowns Submitted To The U.S. SEC Annual Report FY08 Net Profit Down 72% Correction
CNNIC Proposes To Amend The Terms Of Promoting Open To Individuals, CN Domain Name Registration
CPU chip WITH independent intellectual property rights through the acceptance of Godson 2E
Photoshop Photo Noise Reduction Expert: Neat Image Pro filters
